Development moratorium motion must be rejected

I do not believe council are qualified to assume the roles of the municipal staff.

Development moratorium motion must be rejected

“You may delay, but time will not” — Benjamin Franklin

The Municipality of North Cowichan councillor Justice has prepared a motion which is built around “climate emergency” requiring immediate action. The motion calls for the cessation of ALL further development and construction until a plan that fosters walkable “compact energy efficient communities” is developed to accommodate changing climate. All future subdivision applications shall be rejected as not being in the public interest until a new OCP is in place, which is estimated will not be completed before two years have elapsed. (Note: language taken from the proposed motion.)

In addition, the motion proposes “North Cowichan planning staff are to encourage applicants for amendments to the OCP and/or Zoning Bylaw in relation to any of the Lands to defer consideration of their applications until after North Cowichan has completed its review of the OCP, and that, where the applicants are not agreeable to deferring consideration of their applications, all such applications are to be brought to Council at the earliest opportunity for consideration by Council and direction as to whether Council wishes to proceed, or Council wishes to deny the application without further review.”

I do not believe council are qualified to assume the roles of the municipal staff. The process of applications, approvals and so forth are a rules-based process.

I must ask, how will council determine which applications may be approved? Without rules, is there a risk of bias in judgement influencing any or all decisions? Is this in the best interest of the public? Without a detailed explanation the motion, as presented, must be rejected.

One final point, the Local Government Act (s 14.473) states that an official community plan must consider how residential development will meet anticipated housing needs for at least the next five years. (source: CVRD Regional Collaboration Framework – May 2018. Page 31)

How will council fulfill its duty called for above if the motion proceeds?

Christopher Carruthers

North Cowichan

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Protesters showcase massive old yellow cedar as Port Renfrew area forest blockade continues

9.5-foot-wide yellow cedar measured by Ancient Forest Alliance campaigners in Fairy Creek watershed

McDougall-Percillier gets top Rugby Canada honour

“I’m really stoked about getting this award”

Business notes: WINGS set to close on Aug. 29

A few of the things going on in Cowichan’s business community

Collision knocks over fire hydrant on Ypres Street

Duncan firefighters quick to get situation under control

‘Don’t kill my mom’: Ryan Reynolds calls on young British Columbians to be COVID-smart

‘Deadpool’ celebrity responds to premier’s call for social influence support

Captain Horvat’s OT marker lifts Canucks to 4-3 win over Blues

Vancouver takes 2-0 lead in best-of-7 NHL playoff series with St. Louis

Widow of slain Red Deer doctor thanks community for support ahead of vigil

Fellow doctors, members of the public will gather for a physically-distanced vigil in central Alberta

Taking dog feces and a jackhammer to neighbourhood dispute costs B.C. man $16,000

‘Pellegrin’s actions were motivated by malice …a vindictive, pointless, dangerous and unlawful act’

Racist stickers at Keremeos pub leaves group uneasy and angry

The ‘OK’ hand gesture is a known hate-symbol

VIDEO: World responds to B.C. girl after pandemic cancels birthday party

Dozens of cards and numerous packages were delivered to six-year-old Charlie Manning

Expected fall peak of COVID-19 in Canada could overwhelm health systems: Tam

National modelling projections released Friday show an expected peak in cases this fall

Hundreds of sea lions to be killed on Columbia River in effort to save endangered fish

Nearly 22,000 comments received during public review were opposed, fewer than 200 were for

Most Read